"Opportunities for Planned County-Based Wildlife Programming" by Andrea M. Kleist, Christopher E. Moorman et al.

Article Title

Opportunities for Planned County-Based Wildlife Programming

Authors

Andrea M. Kleist, North Carolina State UniversityFollow
Christopher E. Moorman, North Carolina State UniversityFollow
Christopher S. DePerno, North Carolina State UniversityFollow
Robert E. Bardon, North Carolina State UniversityFollow

Volume

Issue

DOI

10.34068/joe.48.02.22

Abstract

Extension personnel trained in agricultural fields may not adequately meet client needs in natural resources-related topics. To help guide strategies to improve planned wildlife programming, we conducted a survey of North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service county agents. Forty-six of 101 county agents responded, with 62% of respondents indicating lack of training limited their abilities to conduct wildlife programming. Development of seminars and educational resources by university-based Extension specialists may help county agents conduct formal programming related to wildlife conservation. Additionally, county agents can partner with local natural resource management professionals to develop and conduct wildlife-related programming.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 4.0 License.

Recommended Citation

Kleist, A. M., Moorman, C. E., DePerno, C. S., & Bardon, R. E. (2010). Opportunities for Planned County-Based Wildlife Programming. The Journal of Extension, 48(2), Article 22. https://doi.org/10.34068/joe.48.02.22

This document is currently not available here.

COinS