Date of Award


Document Type


Degree Name

Master of Science (MS)

Legacy Department

Wildlife and Fisheries Biology

Committee Chair/Advisor

Dr. Kyle Barrett

Committee Member

Dr. Robert Baldwin

Committee Member

Dr. Michael Dorcas


Because rare and cryptic species can be difficult to locate, distribution maps for these species are often inaccurate or incomplete. Bog Turtles (Glyptemys muhlenbergii) are emblematic of this challenge. In fact, conducting surveys of known, historical, and potential Bog Turtle habitat is a specific need stated in the Bog Turtle Northern Population Recovery Plan and in most Comprehensive Wildlife Conservation Strategies of states within the southern range. Therefore we examined ways to better locate Bog Turtle habitat and Bog Turtles within that habitat. First we determined a detection probability for a standardized trapping method so we could effectively survey for Bog Turtles at sites with unknown occupancy status. A species distribution model (SDM) was then used to identify potentially suitable Bog Turtle habitat within the species' southern range. The SDM was ground-validated, using our trapping method, to assess its ability to locate suitable Bog Turtle habitat. At a local scale we then analyzed wetlands occupied and unoccupied by Bog Turtles to examine differences in their habitat characteristics and site history. We had a 0.19 average probability of detecting a turtle at a site during one trapping event, implying 15 trapping events at a site would minimize the probability of Bog Turtles being at a site but going undetected to 5%. Ground-validation of the SDM with this trapping method showed that the SDM greatly over-predicted the amount of suitable habitat. For example, of 196 wetlands in Georgia and South Carolina identified as suitable by the SDM and ground-validated, only 22 met criteria for suitable Bog Turtle habitat, and trapping of 17 of those suitable wetlands revealed only 2 to be occupied by Bog Turtles. At the local scale, a discriminant analysis showed that wetlands with Bog Turtles were distinguishable from those without based on area of the wetland, percent of the wetland that has emergent vegetation, percent of the wetland that is flooded by beaver or lake presence, and water pH. These results suggest that future work should focus on better understanding local scale characteristics distinguishing Bog Turtle wetlands, as current data resolution does not enable a SDM to be effective.



To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.