Date of Award

5-2024

Document Type

Dissertation

Degree Name

Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)

Department

Healthcare Genetics

Committee Chair/Advisor

Dr. Stephanie Davis

Committee Member

Dr. Kim A. Pickett

Committee Member

Dr. Doralyn Jones

Committee Member

Dr. Sara Sarasua

Abstract

In recent years, individuals have become interested in what insights direct-to-consumer genetic testing (DTCGT) can offer about their health. These individuals are recommended to discuss their concerns with a healthcare professional, yet most primary care professionals do not have a genetics-focused practice. This dissertation comprises five chapters to describe the integration of DTCGT results into a patient visit. Chapter I discusses the expanding demand between patients with questions about their DTCGT results and the health professionals who have been tasked to interpret these results. Chapter II is a systematic literature review that identifies what health professionals think about results from non-clinical genetic testing companies and the reasons that they are reluctant to discuss DTCGT results with patients. The literature leads to two main barriers to acceptance of DTCGT: lack of genetic/genomic literacy and the doubtfulness of clinical utility. Healthcare professionals are also concerned about legal and ethical issues that have not been addressed with DTCGT. There may be more acceptance of DTCGT in clinical practice if clinical professional societies or regulatory commissions created guidelines to its use. Chapter III is composed of the results of a survey given to osteopathic medical students that asks about their current knowledge, attitudes, and perceptions of DTCGTs. The findings show that the students were uncomfortable with the idea of discussing DTCGT results with patients due to their perceived lack of knowledge of the subject matter. The majority of students were willing to learn more about DTCGT and how it could be integrated into patient care. This sentiment mirrored the literature on established healthcare professionals.

Chapter IV describes the creation of an online training module to prepare osteopathic medical students for productive interactions with patients who have questions about their DTCGT results. This module was built to bring awareness to common clinical scenarios as well as give students applicable communication points using a virtual standardized patient. As assessed through a pre and post-survey, not only did the module enhance relevant vocabulary, but it also boosted confidence in handling patient interactions versus immediately referring patients to a genetic counselor.

Chapter V is a consolidation of the findings from Chapters II-IV. The systematic literature review and the online survey reveal that medical professionals with minimal genetic/genomic education have some trepidation about discussing DTCGT results with patients. The online training module shows that even a brief exercise can increase student awareness of how DTCGT can impact a patient’s view on personal health goals. All three components (the systematic review, the survey, and the module) show that medical students are ready to learn how to integrate DTCGT results into clinical practice.

Author ORCID Identifier

0000000276350504

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.