Date of Award

12-2021

Document Type

Dissertation

Degree Name

Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)

Department

Education and Organizational Leadership Development

Committee Chair/Advisor

Dr. Natasha Croom

Committee Member

Dr. Michelle Boettcher

Committee Member

Dr. Tony Cawthon

Committee Member

Dr. Cassie Quigley

Abstract

Despite having the necessary credentials to assume executive-level leadership positions at institutions of higher education, Black women continue to be among the least represented in these roles, especially at predominantly White institutions. The purpose of this qualitative study was to illuminate and understand how interlocking systems of oppression impact the leadership and decision-making experiences of Black women in executive-level leadership positions at predominantly White public research institutions in the U.S. The research question was: How do Black women in executive-level leadership positions at predominantly White public research institutions in the U.S. make sense of misogynoir in relation to their leadership and decision-making experiences? Misogynoir is the “anti-Black racist misogyny that Black women experience” (Bailey & Trudy, 2018, p. 2).

Eight Black women in executive-level leadership positions at predominantly White public research institutions in the U.S. took part in the study, each participating in a semi-structured interview lasting approximately 90 minutes. Basic Interpretive Inquiry was the methodology utilized in the study. The experiences of the research participants shed light on the ways in which operating within educational systems built upon White supremacist patriarchy impact the experiences of the Black women administrators they employ. The ways the participants made sense of misogynoir in relation to their leadership and decision-making experiences included the pervasive nature of the controlling images (Collins, 2009) about Black women in their interactions with students, faculty, and staff. They also made sense of misogynoir in how their strong sense of purpose to advocate for the needs of minoritized communities led them to use their agency to challenge the oppressive systems in their work environment. This was juxtaposed with how the policies, practices, and norms of the predominantly White public research institutions in the U.S. that employed them made it difficult for them to live out their purpose in this regard. The research participants also made sense of how exercising their agency, as well as the sense of responsibility to advocate for minoritized communities, had consequences for them—mentally, physically, and professionally.

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.